About Awkward Saints
Investigating the architecture of "Missional Discipleship" systems.
Awkward Saints is a project dedicated to analysing the mechanics of spiritual influence. We exist to help the Church distinguish between the discipleship of love and the discipleship of control.
While much is written about theology, fewer resources exist that examine the sociology and behavioural psychology operating within our churches. We investigate systems that appear healthy from the outside—where the coffee is brewed and the services continue—yet operate internally through mechanisms of disconnection, dependency, and engineered compliance.
Our primary focus is the system often referred to as "Breenism" (associated with Mike Breen, 3DM, and the Order of Mission), though our work applies to any high-control group that trades access for utility.
Our Mission
High-control systems rarely announce themselves. They are built methodically using recognisable tools: invitation-only access, private vocabularies, and social filtering.
Our mission is to make these invisible mechanics visible. By providing a vocabulary to name these dynamics—from "Compliance Gates" to "Discernment Hijacking"—we aim to equip survivors to understand their experiences and leaders to dismantle unsafe structures.
The Purpose Behind the Work
This project exists to protect faith.
For a long time, the very word "discipleship" filled us with dread. It required an intentional discipline just to hear the word without flinching. We distinguish between two conflicting types of discipleship:
- The Discipleship of Love: Where a leader points through themselves to Jesus. Where a disciple can be confused, misaligned, and lacking in "utility," yet still be deeply loved.
- The Discipleship of Shortcuts: Where disciples are selected based on their "capital" or influence. Where the leader is the model to be imitated, and access is a reward for utility. This system offers neat answers to complex questions, distilling behavioural psychology into frameworks designed for control.
We write because we need distinct language for these two opposing realities.
The Project
Awkward Saints consists of three pillars of work:
- Investigations: Deep-dive reporting into specific leaders and organisations, documenting the history and impact of coercive control.
- The Toolkit: Practical resources, glossaries, and frameworks designed to help individuals diagnose their environment and navigate recovery.
- Analysis: Video essays and articles that examine the meta-structures of church growth, such as the "Disconnection Machine" and the misuse of biological metaphors like "grafting".
Loading email...
Comments
A Note on Commenting
Thank you for joining the conversation. This space is intended to be a place for support, clarification, and shared understanding for those who have been impacted by high-control spiritual environments. To help create a safe and constructive dialogue, please consider the following guidelines:
- Pseudonym Friendly. You are encouraged to use a pseudonym to protect your identity. If you do, please try to use it consistently across your comments to help with conversational flow. Avoid sharing personally identifying details like specific locations, workplaces, or the full names of non-public figures. Your safety is the priority.
- Offer Support, Not Unsolicited Advice. Simple words of validation like, "Thank you for sharing," or "That sounds very familiar," can be powerful. Please respect that everyone's journey is unique. Refrain from telling others what they should do or should have done.
- Prioritise Your Well-being. Engaging with this topic can be emotionally demanding. It is okay to step away from the conversation if you feel overwhelmed. You are not obligated to answer questions or respond to every comment. Please pace yourself and prioritise your own mental and emotional health. If you're not 100% comfortable with the topic, please don't feel obligated to comment. This post will still be here tomorrow.
- Engage with Grace. Everyone is at a different stage of healing and understanding. It is possible to disagree with an idea respectfully, but personal attacks, invalidation of others' experiences, or shaming language will not be tolerated. Let's aim to make this a space of mutual respect.
About Daniel Caerwyn
Daniel Caerwyn is a pseudonym – an investigative writer exploring systemic causes of organisational dysfunction. He writes with commitment to the Church and compassion for those within it.
Expertise: